Skip to main content

Featured Post

Utilizing Media: A Response to Deepfakes

  Of the ACM (the Association for Computing Machinery), a magazine called Communication of the ACM's edition releases 1 month before its stated release month. In the latest edition, regarding March 2021, of Communications of the ACM , Column Editor, Susan J. Winter wrote Computing Ethics: What To Do About Deepfakes . Regarding Winter’s desire to halt or hinder illegal or unethical deepfakes, a video technology like wearing a full body masking suit, Winter wrote, “Here are three areas where technical experts can make positive contributions to the development of synthetic media technologies: education and media literacy, subject defense, and verification” (Winter, March, 2021). Winter was saying actions such as teaching and having disruptive technology knowledge, researching professionally, and proving concepts are parts of deepfake experts’ calculus. But this much work specializes such that entry level, junior, work will probably be offered to overqualified professionals. Technic

On Trust, Bias, and Privilege: my Response to 'Anti-Blackness is no glitch'

In Winter 2020, Stephanie T. Jones and Natalie Melo wrote ‘Anti-Blackness is no glitch’: The need for critical conversations within computer science education. Jones and Melo mentioned, “The conversation around and application of computer science often reinforces neoliberal ideals” (Jones, Melo, November 25, 2020, pg. 42). Jones and Melo were saying this: the computer science revolution and organizational IT network futuristic left-wing best standards access is telling.

For Trust, I am Checking my Privilege

But this is not excluding contemporary conversations: any futuristic conversation based on personal interpretation is not from ABBA, so it is not prophecy (NIV, 2 Peter 1:20). For your review, Peter wrote, "For prophecy never had its origin in the human will, but prophets, though human, spoke from [ABBA] as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit" (2 Peter 1:21). You, reader, can predict something shall happen, but prediction is uncertain: it is a terminating series called Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle.

On Bias: Uncertainty, Heisenberg's Principle


Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle is this: combining the change in x, a placeholder variable (this is not a genetics equation), and the p’s flux, the momentum’s uncertainty. This combination is greater than or equals h, Planck’s constant: with π multiplied four times, x’s flux, and Planck’s constant fluctuating. For your information, Max Planck’s constant, of the discoverer of the minimum any physical entity becomes involved per relating interaction. In saying this, there remains a lesser inequality portion Heisenberg found: the aforementioned constant and changing section is greater than or equals the momentum’s uncertainty and π multiplying four times. Science has become more politics-focused, America-wide, and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle regards very small matter and energy, quantum mechanics. You, reader, can call neoliberalism, being a politics subcategory, a minor objective. Thus, you could call a one hundred percent certain prediction a prophecy: it is a real integer. In binary, this is the number 1: it is an on-status event that has already begun, but it does not need be recognized per each sense a human being has; the alternative is a many-to-many relation, and this is dysfunctional. When the wind is felt, the sense, touch, might register, physically (cognition). 

Consider checking your privilege: prophecy.


Altogether, Christian doctrine has changed empire power structures more than neoliberalism. Therefore, Jones and Melo should have regarded society’s greater objective, politics religion timed. In XRDS, the magazine Jones and Melo wrote this for, an ACM (Association for Computing Machinery), a writer stated a concerning message. The aforementioned, but anonymous XRDS writer, stated this: “XRDS is run as a student venture within the ACM by a diverse and inclusive team of engaged student volunteers from all over the world” (XRDS, November 25, 2020, pg. 1). But discussing people without religion is not discussing the aforementioned people: it is a waste of time.



References

Jones, S. T., & Melo, N. (2020, November 25). ‘Anti-Blackness is no glitch’: The need for critical conversations within computer science education. XRDS, 27, 42-46.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In response to the Institute of Industrial Science, the University of Tokyo’s Circular Reasoning: Spiral Circuits for More Efficient AI

Circular Reasoning On June 14, 2020, the IIS (Institute of Industrial Science) at the UTokyo (University of Tokyo) wrote  Circular Reasoning: Spiraling Circuits for More Efficient AI ; but a Press Release from this institute is giving a synopsis on this topic. On this press release, the IIS wrote, “Researchers from the Institute of Industrial Science at the University of Tokyo designed and built specialized computer hardware consisting of stacks of memory modules arranged in a 3D-spiral for artificial intelligence (AI) applications” (IIS, June 14, 2020). The IIS continued on, saying this research is allowing a singular way work can be done regarding the next generation energy efficient AI devices (Here is a current generation, but energy efficient, AI device, Android Pie: link ) shall be implemented into production.             The Fundamentals of Machine Learning                On this press release, the IIS is explaining the fundamentals of ML (Machine Learning). The IIS wrote, “Mach

IS the Future of AI “Women?”

Interdisciplinary Campus Culture On April 14, 2020, Katy Rank Lev wrote the Carnegie Mellon University’s (CMU) news article The Future of AI is Female . Since artificial intelligence’s (AI) initial measurement, wrote Lev, CMU built AI. Lev wrote that each of the colleges CMU is representing contribute to make AI a new field, describing this AI as a frontier, humanity can democratize: from healthcare, the eventual goal area is education. In a rush, Lev cut the conversation short, and Lev mentioned CMU’s interdisciplinary campus culture as the source of the effective AI women, but this is despite women historically not represented as scientists, technologists, and engineers, and math (STEM), worldwide. But CMU is spotlighting undergraduate students and highly honored faculty members, and Lev is including these women because she agrees with the Women in Tech movement as far as the East is from the West: CMU is the best Computer Science University with AI, and this is IT at this point in

Drone Uses AI and 11,500 Crashes to Learn How to Fly

Learning to Fly by Crashing On 10 May, 2017, Evan Ackerman wrote the IEEE (Institute for Electricians and Electrical Engineers) SPECTRUM article Drone Uses AI and 11,500 Crashes to Learn How to Fly. In Ackerman’s article, Ackerman used a block quote by Carnegie Mellon University roboticists Dhiraj Gandhi, Lerrel Pinto; and Abhinav Gupta, the writers of a paper, “Learning to Fly by Crashing” (Gandhi, et. al., 27 Apr 2017). From Ackerman’s block quote from Gandhi, et. al., “[T]he gap between simulation and real world remains large especially for perception problems” (Gandhi, et. al.). Ackerman contrasted known motion from unconfirmed motion without identifying the pre-existing condition called Schrödinger’s cat in the case that the crashes shall eventually happen without outside help: a continuing crash failure, and in security terms this is interned as a false positive because this helps Schrödinger’s cat stay alive or rest buried in the soil. In this case, this drone detects these t

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *