Of the ACM (the Association for Computing Machinery), a magazine called Communication of the ACM's edition releases 1 month before its stated release month. In the latest edition, regarding March 2021, of Communications of the ACM , Column Editor, Susan J. Winter wrote Computing Ethics: What To Do About Deepfakes . Regarding Winter’s desire to halt or hinder illegal or unethical deepfakes, a video technology like wearing a full body masking suit, Winter wrote, “Here are three areas where technical experts can make positive contributions to the development of synthetic media technologies: education and media literacy, subject defense, and verification” (Winter, March, 2021). Winter was saying actions such as teaching and having disruptive technology knowledge, researching professionally, and proving concepts are parts of deepfake experts’ calculus. But this much work specializes such that entry level, junior, work will probably be offered to overqualified professionals. Technic
Information Technology and Ignorance
In 1986 AD, Daniel C. Dennett wrote Information, Technology, and the Virtues of Ignorance (link). When Dennett was ten years old, he read Robinson Crusoe. When Dennett read Robinson Crusoe, he loved technology. Dennett loved technology so much: Dennett claimed technology is good; Dennett did not rationalize his devotions. Dennett stated we control technology unlike magic. Dennett claimed that technology that exists: is true. Dennett claimed his technology is convenient, for its blessings: his technology group has received provisions.
Put an end to Tradition
Against troubling technology traits, Dennett gave a proposition. Dennett claimed: his peers should leave tradition behind, or else information technology can ruin his peers' and his lives. Dennett believed we all want our lives good. Dennett stated: we want lead lives interesting. Also, Dennett stated we want lead lives good. Dennett described these things useful and a right difference. Next, Dennett called his work might possible inedible. Dennett defended himself: Dennett claimed new technology knowledge sources, against old technology sources are the replacements.
Do not love the world or its items
In the Scriptures, there is writing: do not participate in world-love and technology love. 1 John 2:15 (BSB) stated, "Do not love the world or anything in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him." I believe this means the world itself and the items rather than certain people should be loved, but be careful not to offer you all players’ pants to a man demanding them in addition to your coat and shirt because that is too much. The point of accepting Jesus Christ is survival rather than accepting a permanent bodily and spiritual defeat: in Christian doctrine, the fire (Matt 10:28), and in some scientific groups, universal entropy, with the second scenario based on the Second Law of Thermodynamics (link). However, the solution to stopping the universe from heat death is opening the system, and this might be possible with wormholes because a wormhole passageway is open on both ends.
Do not love technology that is practically anything
In the world, including with Man vs. Wild with Bear Grylls (link), technology is practically any thing: do not love it. Dennett loved technology, so he did not rationalize his love, for he claimed technology-love is an affair; but technology is not good. For Dennett, good is an edible love affair. Toward hell, adultery is a trajectory (Ezekiel 40), and this is not a joke for food. Instead, I believe good is my one true ABBA, Jehovah Jirah (Matt 19:17, Mark 10:18, Rom 3:4).
Comments
Post a Comment